22nd
April 2019
Natasha Dunn and others
Metropolitan Police Service
London
Re: Nihilistic attitude of Natasha Dunn and
lawyers (including judges) and my response
To Natasha Dunn and others who eventually read it,
I’ve numbered the points in this letter as it should help
to make the different issues more clear, plus it will help to stop me repeating
myself.
Introduction
1. As
you already know, and as will quickly become clear in this letter, I am
absolutely furious at the behaviour of many (although not all) members of the
British authorities that I have had dealings with over the past few years.
2. I
strongly feel that my attitude is completely justified, along with being
completely understandable, once the huge efforts I have taken to try and gain
justice are taken into account.
3. As
I write this, I have to consider whether I am just being a bit childish in my
response. But if I am then what would the adult thing to do be? You need to
bear in mind here that I have a very good memory and so know that I will never
forget things like this. Considering what happened, including me being left
with a scar on my nose, and my Dad having to drive up from Dorset that
Christmas Eve in what was a 5-hour roundtrip for him, just to bring me the
spare car key, I think it’s perfectly reasonable to be extremely keen to get
justice.
4. How
can I let something like this go, when I still remember being bullied and
punched in the face at school in 1993 and 1994, and being punched so hard in
the face in 2003 that it sent me flying to the floor of a Sutton supermarket,
but in neither case getting justice?
5. Surely
the adult thing to do is to write letters, request evidence, ask for help from
those in authority, in an attempt to take private legal action when the
authorities have let me down?
6. Having
then done the above, to find that the British authorities not only not help me
but actually go out of their way to prevent me being able to take legal action
against the thug who assaulted me, has left me furious with the British
authorities.
7. Just
to add insult on top of insult to
injury, when I am asked not to contact Natasha by her line manager and respond
to that with an email which Natasha is merely copied in on, to have her then
report me to the police, is just so amazingly bad it’s insane.
8. In
conclusion just to the introduction to this letter, if the British authorities
treat people badly then you cannot complain (in any moralistic sense) when
people react negatively. I am going to pursue this issue until the day I
receive justice. If that means contacting Natasha Dunn, her husband Bradley and
even her parents, then so be it. If it means maintaining a blog for years to
come, on which I feature Natasha Dunn and various other members of the British
authorities, such as the two deceitful judges that I have come across, then
again, so be it.
9. I’m
the one with a scar on my nose, not Natasha. I’m the one who had to abandon my
car that night and walk home, not Natasha. I’m the one who had to have my Dad
carry out a 5-hour roundtrip that Christmas Eve just to bring me the spare car
key, not Natasha. In short, I’m the victim here, not Natasha.
Natasha’s letter
10. I
never received that letter at the time.
11. You
say that you found my “comments and behaviour to be offensive and intrusive”.
12. You
spent all year trying to prevent me getting my hands on evidence which I needed
to be able to take out private legal action against someone who assaulted me,
leaving me with a scar on my nose.
13. This
was despite the fact that I had tried to reach out to your humanity early in
the year.
14. If
not before then at least in September, when it would have been clear to the
police that I was only going to take out a personal injury claim, you could’ve
sent me that material.
15. Even
from September you still refused point-blank to send me that material.
16. You
were well aware that I had a time limit. Despite that, on top of the above, you
ignored emails from me.
17. You
successfully ran down the clock, thereby denying me justice. As a response, I
created a blog, and on the 21st December 2018 I wrote a comment on
your public Facebook page.
18. That
was an entirely justifiable response.
19. You
say that you found it intrusive. But what choice did I have when you had
deliberately run down the clock and on top of that, ignored my emails?
20. You
had even gone so far as to employ a bloody barrister to try and stop me getting
my hands on that material.
21. You
not just refused to help me, despite me trying to reach out to your humanity,
you actually went out of your way to stop me. Do you seriously think that you
should be able to go through life, treating people like dirt, and then not to
receive a negative response?
22. As
for finding my comments offensive – good. You absolutely deserve it.
23. Regarding
reporting this “incident” to the police, since when was writing a message on
someone’s public Facebook page a crime?
24. I
hearby inform you that I wasn’t even contacted by the Metropolitan Police about
the above.
25. With
all of the above in mind, I find your behaviour to be utterly despicable.
Reporting me to the
police
26. Following
on from the above section, I mentioned that I didn’t receive that letter from
you at the time. If I had done so, I would have immediately responded to you.
Since when can a person say to someone else that they don’t want that other
person to contact them but criticise them at the same time, and then complain
when that person responds to the criticism?
27. Responding
to that criticism is one of the things I am doing with this letter.
28. I
was flabbergasted when, in February, a detective contacted me, wanting me to
come in for an interview under caution. The alleged “offence”? When your line
manager sent me an email in January, asking me not to contact you, and I
replied to her, copying you in. Are you insane?
29. I
refused to come in for such an interview. Had I done so, although I’m sure no
charges would have been brought, what it would have meant is that on police
files somewhere would have been a mention of me being interviewed under caution
on suspicion of harassment (I’m guessing, although I was never told
specifically). The result of that would be that should I have any involvement
with the police in the future, they would bring it up, and wouldn’t for one
moment believe me when I said to them that it was for merely copying someone in
on an email. They would just say, “it must have been more than that”.
30. Why
do you think being copied in on an email, which was only in response to your
line manager’s email anyway, was worthy of a police officer’s time?
31. Why
do you think it more worthy having the police deal with something like that
then allowing me the opportunity to take my own private legal action against
that thug, Paul Stewart, especially when the justice system had let me down?
32. Why
do you think it’s been acceptable to take up my time, to take up your own time
when you’re employed in the public sector, to take up the time of Aaron Moss,
to take up the time of that barrister, to take up the time of my MP, to take up
the time of judges and court staff, and finally to take up the time of that
detective?
33. And
if you think that you’re really not that bad then prove it: take legal action
against Paul Stewart for me. Get compensation for me, half of which I would use
perhaps for plastic surgery or counselling, and half of which I would give to
my poor father, for having had to drive up to London that Christmas Eve in what
was a five-hour roundtrip for him. Or start a private prosecution against Stewart
for ABH. If you’re not willing to do either of those things after having
behaved so badly, and you cannot or will not persuade your colleagues to do so
on your behalf, then don’t expect me to ever drop this issue.
34. You,
Natasha, are quite definitely the one in the wrong here. And I’m not going to
forget that.
Being sent the
material in January
35. After
a year of asking, I was finally sent the material that I needed in January.
36. I’m
trying not to use strong language in this document but that was just taking the
piss. What on earth was going through the minds of people in that legal
department to do that?
37. How
was the Met able to send me that evidence in the end without a court order?
38. Why
wasn’t it sent to me in September?
39. Why
wasn’t it sent to me a year ago?
40. Why
did you pay for a barrister to prevent me getting it when I wanted it?
41. As
the Met sent me that evidence without a court order, presumably Natasha and/or
her line manager will be sacked as a result?
42. Or
alternatively, presumably Natasha and/or her line manager will be sacked as a
result of not having sent it to me when I first asked, or at least in
September?
43. Or
is it the case that people in that legal department, just like the deceitful
judges that I have come across, just do whatever they want and then find some
aspect of the law or policies to back up whatever they wanted to do in the
first place?
Conclusion and
final points
44. I
needed evidence that the police held to be able to take private legal action this
thug. You could’ve just sent it to me in February or March last year. Instead,
you point-blank refused to do so. There has never been any good justification
of why not. In fact, Natasha waited two months and then sent my MP an obvious
non-answer of a letter. Seriously, do you two think that I’m stupid?
45. I
am going to get my day in court. The question is, will that be defending a
claim of harassment by Natasha, or will it be prosecuting a claim against that
thug? I would much prefer the latter.
46. I
was actually embarrassed on behalf of that detective that had to contact me
about this issue before. With that in mind, I plan on deleting without reading
any emails from him. I will continue to contact Natasha. Therefore, a case
would have to be brought against me.
47. This
is the point at which Natasha and Sarah Heron, and perhaps others, need to take
a step back, think about what my attitude and behaviour is, and decide whether
you’re actually going to not just not help me get justice, as in, not oppose me
– it’s too late to take that attitude – but whether you’re going to put serious
effort into helping me gain justice.
48. Even
I can see that getting justice for myself at this point will be extremely
difficult. Frankly though, that is your problem, not mine. From DC Winters not
being honest with me about what the second hearing was about three years ago,
to Natasha getting the Met to pay for a barrister to defend my legal attempt to
get the evidence I needed to take any sort of private legal action against that
thug, the Met’s behaviour has been absolutely infuriating.
49. So
are you going to help me to gain justice or are you just going to report me to
the police? If it’s the latter, which it’s almost certain to be because of the
bitchy, selfish people you are, then do you actually understand that I’m
serious when I say I’m going to pursue this issue for years to come? And do
either of you realise that reporting me to the police will just further prove
my point about what you’re like?
50. Natasha
may claim at some point that her mental health is being affected by this. But
what about my mental health? What
about how much this has all affected me?
I repeat again that, for example, I’m the one with a scar on my nose, not
Natasha.
51. I
say directly to Natasha: be advised that I am not going to go away until I
receive justice. I will contact you, your husband, Bradley “wannabe secret
agent” Dunn, and even your parents, the descriptions of you on my blog will get
harsher and harsher, and I will do whatever else I can possibly think of, until
the day I receive justice.
52. You
have brought this upon yourself Natasha.
53. You
want to treat people with no humanity? Fine. I can’t force you to change, to be
decent, conscientious people. But, in my own minor way, I can fight back. I can
pursue this for years and years and years to come.
54. I
am a better, more decent person, than countless members of the British
authorities, whether they be Natasha Dunn, Sarah Heron, DC Lara Winters, that
deceitful judge or the judge that backed him up, or the magistrates that threw
out a perfectly good case. When this case of “harassment” reaches court and
some magistrates or a judge ignore all sense of morality, I will add them to
the list and just say this: I am a better human being than all of you.
Yours sincerely,
John Smith
Appendix
Sayings that I may not have heard yet but equally don’t
want to hear:
I was just doing my
job.
Well stop just going your job and do the right thing.
Saying that you are just doing your job is one step away from saying that you
are just following orders, and we know from history where that kind of attitude
leads.
I am sorry that you
are unhappy but…
I have sympathy for
what happened, however…
If I say, “I’m not racist but…” or “I’m not racist,
however…”, the words “but” or “however” cancel out what was said before them.
Sometimes words like that are just good ‘joining’ words
in sentences, and I may well use them myself. A lot of the time though they
really do show that what was said before them wasn’t sincere.
My blog:
Stopped by the Met
Police from gaining justice
met-police-legal-games.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.