18th
December 2018
To District Judge
Hugman,
Wandsworth County Court
Before John Smith, sitting at home (as no hearing
was called where I could explain myself).
You say the following:
=====
In this claim the claimant says he is making the claim “in case a different judge takes a different
view.” That is not a cause of action and this claim therefore is an abuse
of process, the issue already having been determined at a hearing.
=====
You are quoting me out of
context!!!
What I actually said was the following:
=====
Please note: back in January I submitted an application
notice which was returned to me by the court with a handwritten note from
District Judge Parker - please see attached copy. I then submitted a claim
form. However, today in a court hearing, I was told quite clearly that I needed
to have submitted an application notice. With this in mind, I am today
submitting both an application notice and a claim form. The claim form is
merely there in case a different judge
takes a different view as to which form I needed to use. If an application
notice is indeed the correct form to use then please just ignore the claim
form. (I refuse to lose any more time due to submitting a form with the wrong
two words at the top.)
=====
Let me highlight that whole sentence for you and my MP to
read again:
The claim form is merely
there in case a different judge takes a
different view as to which form I needed to use.
No, you’re right, what you’ve ‘quoted’ isn’t a cause of
action. But it wasn’t the action I was taking! You have come out with a blatant
straw man argument here.
The last time that happened was with a complaint against
DC Winters of Merton CID, which was initially investigated by a sergeant based
in the same building. This sergeant ‘investigated’ something which I wasn’t
actually complaining about, so naturally didn’t uphold my complaint. I appealed
and, after having to wait 18 months, had my complaint upheld. DC Winters now
has on her record an upheld complaint of neglect of duty.
The fact that you not only didn’t quote the whole of the
relevant paragraph but didn’t even quote the whole of a single sentence, shows
that you must be well aware of what you are doing.
Moving on, let me quote something that you’ve said:
“The principal in the Norwich Pharmacol case is now found
in CPR 31.18.”
So what’s the problem then? (By the way, “Pharmacol” is
spelt incorrectly.) Presumably you meant to say “not”, but so what? I didn’t
say it was. I don’t see why that stops me referring to it.
You say that:
=====
The issue in this case, in law, identical to the issue in
claim E00WT562 and brought by the same claimant against the same defendant.
That claim was disposed of at a hearing on 7th September 2018. No
appeal was made against the decision to strike out that claim …
=====
Firstly, I didn’t appeal that decision as there was no
point (and don’t quote me out of context on that, for goodness sake). I was
told, by the judge, that I had used the wrong form for the wrong reason.
Therefore, I brought a new case, this time using the correct form and for the
right reason. Therefore, the issue in this case, in law, is absolutely NOT
identical to the issue in claim E00WT562.
You order that “the claim is struck out as an abuse of
process and accordingly wholly without merit.”
But the reason given for saying that it is an “abuse of
process” is based on something which, in effect (as it’s so blatantly quoted
out of context), was not something I was claiming. Therefore it can’t be an
abuse of process!
Also, talking about “abuse of process”, two years ago,
that thug Paul Stewart had the prosecution against him dismissed on the grounds
of abuse of process, as he had already accepted a caution. However, his caution
was set aside and he was charged, after I had a successful right-to-review
request. He shouldn’t have been offered a caution to start with. As I wasn’t
told what was going on, and therefore wasn’t able to challenge this nonsense,
he successfully duped the magistrates, who stopped the case on the grounds that
it was an “abuse of process”.
The fact is though
is that I still have a scar on my nose, apart from anything else. So to say
that something is “an abuse of process and accordingly wholly without merit” is
bloody insulting.
As I’m sure you know, the problem I now have is that this
was already an appeal, so despite the fact that you have really blatantly
misrepresented what I was doing and what I said, you may well get away with it,
just like a criminal (like Paul Stewart, for example) with a smooth-talking
lawyer.
You have blatantly abused your powers. Unfortunately, as
the JCIO only seem to care if a judge is racist or something similar, they will
no doubt not do anything. Tell me something: as you have so blatantly abused
your powers, why shouldn’t I take the law into my own hands?
I’m attaching a copy of my Victim Personal Statement,
which I had been expected to be able to read out at Paul Stewart’s trial, had
he been found guilty, which I imagine he would have been as the evidence was really
good.
The criminal justice system has successfully denied me
justice. Comprising such psychopaths as DC Winters, Natasha Dunn, judge Parker,
judge Hugman, and various others. I hope you all feel proud of yourselves,
having well and truly let me down.
By the way, don’t act as if the law is everything in
life. After all, you all break the speed limit when you drive and don’t then
report yourselves. You are breaking the law and yet don’t care. So all that all
of you have done is abused the law to get what you want. And sod justice.
Yours sincerely,
John Smith
Dated 18th December 2018
PS. The order is dated the 22nd November. And
yet the date at the top of the order is the 17th December. What on
earth is going on at that court?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.